I picked one up yesterday and it looked like only 1/2 of them were "on". Id also like it if all the engine ports off the back of the brutix actually gave off some flame/trail. The gap in the punishers wings also needs to be filled in. The Maller needs to get the wiregriding removed from the little antenna things on the end of the wings (look real close and you see a little wireframe "box" around them, has bugged me whenever Ive flown one). The harpy and the hawk need to get their turret points moved to the wingtips and head like the merlin cuz w/o turrets there, the ship just looks dumb, but with them o so sweet.
#Omen eve online recolor trial#
The "center of mass"-thing has annoyed me to hell ever since my first trial >.<Īlso, as someone else posted earlier, make realistic turret mounts dammit! RABBLEįirst, the nitpicky. They will look better without it for sure. These are combat ships, not christmas trees with sparkling lights (and hanging rubbish and wide open inner structure). Again, there must not be any element of a ship model placed there for "looking stylish" only.
If there are "sticking out" parts of a ship, their purpose must be clear. The surface of a ship should tend to be as small as possible, approaching spheric form, because of turning overloads and attempt to make armor coating thicker with the same mass. Show them, they must be there! A ship can neither stop by itself in space, nor turn that fast without them (a big stopping engine, and a handful of turning engines around the hull, turning on when spinning or stopping).Ģ. So no jets on the "outskirts" of a ship.ĭ) manevuer engines. Besides, an engine is a massive module, and it needs to be well-protected. that's why the force must be applied to the center of mass. If there are separate warp and maneuver engines, make them look different.Ĭ) Engines should propel a ship forwards.
Why on earth would amarrian navy pay for a ship with 4 or 5 different engines (different size and form of exhausts)ī) a ship should have one or 2 engines, not more. Ships are usually built of more or less standartised modules. On NPC Catalyst it is awesome )Īnd guys, if you want to rewrite certain models, please take into account common logic.ġ. Most of amarrian ships have the problem with jet flames coming out not of exhausts, but near (or not near) them. The 2 symmetrical polygons missing from the sides of the ship are inside it's glass drone bay.ĥ. The front armor plating doesn't have any texture on it's inner side, and is transparent under certain angles.Ĥ. the front right side gun is apart from the hull. The ECM amarr frig (don't remember the name) A polygon in it's nose is missing. Upper front guns aren't connected to the hull. The end of each wing isn't connected to the hull. The models are good, but most of them are flawed. from the side it definitely needs a diet of a session or two on the rack. Prophecy, from above it's a cool ship, from astern that huge bank of engines looks great, from forward it works. I'd like to see it take some "insiration" from the design of the Nyx.
but somehow the sum of the parts is greater than the whole.
Thorax, it doesn't need doing really but I'd love to see it mirrored and the two versions superimposed and welded together, a minor tweak to the "hollow" side section and there you have it - the best looking cruiser in the game just got sexier (and because it would have two pods underneath even the people who like to take the mickey out of its shape will be happy ).ĭominix, a lot of things about the Domi work very well indeed. Most (if not all) of the other problems will disappear when it's resurfaced. Exequeror, I don't think it needs a big change but increasing its symetry (removing the lower engine pod or duplicating it on the other side) and a bit of a tweak to the nose is about all the basic shape of the model needs.
0 kommentar(er)
